Biochar

Nutrient Recovery from Integrated Cellulosic Biorefineries

Nutrient Recovery from Integrated Cellulosic Biorefineries (link)
Robert Brown, Iowa State University, Bioeconomy Institute 2008

"That Iowa has some of the richest soil in the world is no secret, and a group of researchers at Iowa State University would like to ensure that Iowa’s soil retains its high quality. These researchers are investigating alternative cropping systems and practices such as applying biochar (also called agrichar) to the soil to protect it from the loss of organic matter and fertility that could accompany the proliferation of biorefineries across Iowa’s landscape. The Iowa State research team is looking at the impact of the removal of large amounts of crop residue from agricultural fields. Their goal is to ensure that farmers will be able to generate the large amounts of biomass feedstocks that cellulosic biorefineries will need to meet the
demands of a developing bioeconomy, while also being able to return carbon
and important nutrients such as phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen back to the soil."

See Links

Peter Cundall: Slow Burning Solution

Peter Cundall: Slow Burning Solution
In Organic Gardener (Australia), September/October 2008, Courtesy Ron Larson and Albert Bates
Using BiocharUsing Biochar

Excerpt:
"How can we use biochar?

That’s where we come in. I’m just one of many gardeners throughout the world beginning to experiment and study the way charcoal, mixed with added minerals – such as forms of decomposed organic matter and other natural nutrients – can be used in suburban food gardens.

Already I have managed to achieve surprising results. For a start, it has become clear that less water and fewer fertilisers are needed in soils enriched with biochar. Acidic soils benefit by being sweetened, earthworm populations increase and bacterialand other forms of life in the soil become more complex and balanced. There is some evidence that methane gas emissions from the soil are also reduced, as well as those of nitrous oxide, a deadly greenhouse gas that is 310 times more destructive to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.

In our Tasmanian garden, this soil treatment has already produced better, healthier growth and plants that appear to be resistant to diseases and suffer fewer pest attacks.

First, an obvious question: where can gardeners get biochar? How can home gardeners make it, without causing atmospheric pollution? Already a few (though not many) garden centres are selling pulverised charcoal – mainly for orchid growers. It can be expensive, but I believe that in the near future an increased demand for biochar will make it an easily available, cheap soil additive.

How Can we Produce It?

Charcoal can be made from any form of so-called waste organic matter. Our rubbish tips are full of the stuff. Major sources include countless millions of tonnes of factory and farm waste such as animal droppings, sugarcane trash and straw. Forestry and sawmill operations produce great piles of organic debris, much of which is
burnt on site, causing serious pollution and health problems. Deliberately-lit forest burns are a still a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.

Modern techniques of creating hugeamounts of biochar by heating organic matter in an almost oxygen-free environment (without pollution) have now been developed and are already in use in many countries. Combustible gases produced during these processes
are carefully drawn off and stored or put to use. Clearly, environmentally-sensible
methods of manufacturing biochar are both possible and beneficial.

Living in a cool climate has helped me make my own charcoal. We use a slow-combustion wood-fired heater and cooker. This flat-top stove is big, black, ugly and built like a Centurion tank. When I bought it 25 years ago, it had a label attached which claimed that it was ‘Guaranteed for Life’.

We can insert two giant logs in it and, by virtually cutting off the air supply, cause the wood to burn slowly while still throwing out heat for the best part of a day. A double-burner ensures no combustible gases escape,and there is hardly any smoke.

It enables us to heat our home and, at the same time, slow-cook casseroles, soups and other food. After about 12 hours, even very large logs have gradually been turned into huge chunks of brittle charcoal that can be easily and safely raked out.

Making biochar mix

After being cooled by being dumped on clumps of perennial weeds and then wetted, the charcoal lumps are ready for crushing. I add wet coco-peat to keep the moisture in and help absorb dust particles. Some gardeners recommend crushing charcoal chunks by placing them in a strong bucket and bashing them. Unfortunately, most buckets
aren’t made to take this type of battering and will quickly fall apart.

An easier, more reliable, method is to use two hefty firewood logs, one of them with a fairly flat surface. Here’s how to do it:
• Spread a plastic sheet over an area of level ground with the flat piece of wood laid on top, near the centre.
• Thickly spread the charcoal pieces over the flat top of the wood and give them
a good thumping using the butt of the second log. It takes only minutes to make half-a-bucket of crushed charcoal.
• Into this, mix one-part each of coarse sand and garden (or potting) soil to double the bulk. Where leafy or other nitrogen-hungry vegetables are to be grown, I also add 2 litres of water into which one tablespoonful of fish emulsion and another of seaweed concentrate is dissolved.
• When this is poured into the charcoal mix, a stiff black slurry, thickly dotted
with fragments of charcoal is created. It can be stored or used straight away.

Other uses

Biochar can also be used as a surface mulch, where the black colour helps the soil to warm more rapidly in early spring. It can also be applied as a side dressing alongside growing plants. I prefer to bury it prior to sowing seed or planting seedlings. If used to grow potatoes, place the seed tubers along the base of a 20cm-deep trench and cover with a thin layer of soil. Then spread a 5cm-deep and wide layer of biochar over the top and backfill with soil.

Does it work?

The most dramatic results I’ve had so far are with sweet corn. I created two
15cm-deep grooves in the soil, then half-filled them with biochar mix and covered this with soil. I sowed the sweet corn seeds just beneath the surface, but in contact with the layer of biochar. I also sowed two other rows of sweet corn seed, this time without biochar, using only pulverised sheep and poultry manure mixed with blood and bone.

Two weeks later the differences were already obvious. The biochar seedlings were up and moving fast, while the rows of untreated seeds showed erratic germination. As the plants grew, I watered all of them and later mulched them in the same way. However, the biochar corn grew with extraordinary strength and final yields were at least
twice that of the untreated rows. Some biochar-treated plants actually bore up
to six large cobs each, because even the side-shoots (normally non-productive)
both carried two cobs each.

A similar biochar experiment with tomato seedlings showed little difference in yield, although treated plants had a slightly healthier leaf colour and showed no signs of disease."

See article attached.

Organic Gardener, New South Wales. http://www.abc.net.au/gardening/features/organic_gardener.htm

For more information about Peter Cundall see:
Peter Cundall (Wikipaedia)
Peter Cundall on Gardening Australia ABC Website

Sustainable Technology:Biochar

Sustainable Technology: Biochar
Julie Major, Workshop presented to Sustainable Harvest International,Honduras, January 2008

Reported in La Cosecha (The Harvest), Sustainable Harvest International newsletter, Spring 2008, p. 4.

Black is the New Green: SHI Field Staff Learn the Benefits of Biochar for Agriculture

During the annual Board and staff meeting held in January in Honduras, field staff from Honduras, Nicaragua, Belize and Panama attended a workshop presented by Julie Major of Cornell University on managing soils with biochar. Biochar can be made simply and cheaply from any organic material, just by piling it, covering it up with soil to exclude air and setting it on fire. During the workshop biochar was made from rice hulls and pieces of pine wood for demonstration, but any crop residue or plant waste can be used to make biochar, such as coffee pulp, sawdust, sugarcane bagasse, etc.

Sustainable Harvest International
http://www.sustainableharvest.org/

Julie Major, Cornell University
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/jm322/

Chaotech Pty Ltd

Chaotech Pty Ltd.
Rex Manderson [rexm@chaotech.com.au], Australia, July 2008

BiogasWorks PilotBiogasWorks Pilot

This site www.biogasworks.com is the portal for the carbon cycle activities of Chaotech Pty Ltd.

Our slow carbonization pilot plant is now rated 40 to 60kg charcoal per hour for lightweight feed such as sawdust. The specification particle size limit is 8mm largest dimension. Process simulations have produced a yield of ~40% char on a dry mass basis with ~80% total carbon content in the char.

See: Biogas works

Australian Biochars

Australian Biochars
Jerome Matthews, June 21, 2008
Australian BiocharsAustralian Biochars

Hi There,

We are commercial suppliers of biochars and just thought that you may be interested as we don't think that anyone else is yet producing to our levels. We're happy to receive queries.

You may find us at http://www.biochars.com

Best regards.

Jerome Matthews

Agrichar Video

Agrichar Video
Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 2007

Video on Agrichar, International Agrichar Initiative conference (April 2007), BEST Technologies, and use of agrichar in Australia.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/broadband/catalyst/asx/Agrichar_hi.asx

Terracarbona.com - A New Website for the Promotion of Biochar Research and Experimentation

Terracarbona.com - A New Website for the Promotion of Biochar Research and Experimentation
Chris Braun. February 27, 2008

A new website for the promotion of biochar research and experiments was born !
http://terracarbona.com

You can there discover several biochar-related projects, most of them still in active development . If you are performing biochar soil amendmend trials yourself, your contribution to CharDB or to the Field Trial Portal would be highly appreciated!
And if you haven't done it so far but would like to start experimenting, you can also find useful resources, links and contacts to help you.

This website is still in its infancy and any constructive comment, critic, question, advice... is very important for further development ! For that you can use the devoted forum:
http://z15.invisionfree.com/CharDB/index.php?showforum=2

Thanks for your contribution!

Sincerely yours,
Chris
terracarbona@bionecho.org

Effects of mycorrhizal fungi and biochar 90 Days

Effects of mycorrhizal fungi and biochar 90 Days

Robert Flanagan, Hangzhou Sustainable Agricultural Food & Fuel Enterprise Co., Ltd. (SAFFE), February 15, 2008

Day 90Day 90

Hey Guys, Just got to 90days of my latest biochar trial and wanted some feedback on what data you think I should be taking from this trial? We can clean off the roots and photo as much as possible and do clearly marked side by side photos.

I don't have any funding for this trials so there is a limit on the depth I can go regarding data collection so I'm really looking for a base list. The medium was sterilized subsoil and we used 2Kg soil per tray with three reps of each treatment (I just took the average of each treatment for the attached photo).

Kind Regards, Rob.

Robert Flanagan
Chairman & President Hangzhou Sustainable Agricultural Food & Fuel Enterprise Co., Ltd.

saffechina@gmail.com

Skype "saffechina"

Tel: 86-571-881-850-67 Cell: 86-130-189-959-57

ControlControl
BiocharBiochar

Modified BiocharModified Biochar

Effects of mycorrhizal fungi and biochar 75 Days

Effects of mycorrhizal fungi and biochar 75 Days
Robert Flanagan, Hangzhou Sustainable Agricultural Food & Fuel Enterprise Co., Ltd.
(SAFFE), February 5, 2008

I just got to visit my biochar trial at BIOTROP today so I took a few photos to give all you some idea of the profound difference biochar makes to subsoil
ControlControl

Rice Husk CharcoalRice Husk Charcoal

Rice Husk Charcoal + VAMRice Husk Charcoal + VAM

Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvo1w8gFSts

What we're seeing is the plants treated with VAM fungi + biochar are a lot darker green and show more plant growth at the 75day mark so I'll push on up to day90 and see what happens.

Robert Flanagan
Chairman & President
Hangzhou Sustainable Agricultural Food & Fuel Enterprise Co., Ltd.

Skype "saffechina"
Tel: 86-571-881-850-67
Cell: 86-130-189-959-57

Charcoal in agriculture: Experimental research at Fourth Corner Nurseries

Charcoal in agriculture: Experimental research at Fourth Corner Nurseries
Richard Haard, Fourth Corner Nurseries, Bellingham, Washington, January 3, 2008

Greetings

I just finished over the last few days organizing images and data from my charcoal experimental plots. I am presenting a new set of posters showing root systems of the native shrub, Lonicera involucrata or black twinberry that I used as an experimental subject in these treatment plots this summer.

This will be the last of a series of piecemeal postings about my findings on the terrapreta reading list. In time, I will prepare a summary of what I have accomplished this year, the shortcomings, what I feel I have learned from this work about using charcoal and my plans for continuing this experiment for 2 or more growing seasons.

Quick background - my employer, Fourth Corner Nurseries is a bare root native plant nursery. We grow more than 350 kinds of plants for environmental restoration and landscaping purposes. Our farm is 60 acres in 2 fields. Shown here is our east field. Formerly, I have been trying charcoal as a soil additive for several years and this season I attempted a controlled experiment. It did not go without a hitch.

What I established this year was a series of 28 - 17 foot long treatment blocks that are a pair of treatment sets consisting of untreated soil, charcoal only, fertilizer only compost only and combinations of charcoal, compost, fertilizer. In each treatment block 3 kinds of plants were installed: a native shrub, Lonicera; a native perennial - Aster subspicatus; and a vegetable - swiss Chard.
All were selected for their heavy nitrogen consumers and all production was removed from the plots, roots and tops, then the plots replanted and cropped again without further fertilizer, compost or charcoal.

The most detailed measurements accomplished this year is 2 sets of soil chemical analysis completed at a University laboratory. Plant response measurements this year, for several reasons was only visual observation. This set of posters I am presenting today shows subtle but interesting and positive additive effects of compost and charcoal.
Further analysis will be presented at a later date.

How it went. Early April while the plants were still dormant I took 2 year old bareroot Lonicera seedlings trimmed tops and roots and planted in peat/perlite mix in 4X4 inch containers. At these same time I planted
sprigs of Aster
in the same manor. After the plants had firmly rooted into the containers and our field soil had warmed, I prepared a growing bed in our normal propagation field ( Field 13, row 8). The growing bed is about 4
feet wide and 500 feet long. I divided this into 17 foot beds with separate treatments in a systematic way. Here is charcoal 1, a fine powder that was donated by JF Waste energy systems. Here is charcoal 2 a lump and powder mix that
Larry Williams and I
made with a top draft earth covered mound. I am using the lump charcoal because I can observe microbe utilization over time as Larry has been studying for several years.

Here are the charcoal test beds are they appeared before rototilling. In this image furthest is compost only, then compost/charcoal1,then compost/charcoal2,then compost/charcoal 1/fertilizer and so on in a systematic pattern repeating again in a second duplicate set on the north end of the field. In discussing these tests I sometimes discuss each set separately, are are called south set and north set.

Here are the plots immediately after rototilling. Note that the charcoal does not appear to be uniformly dispersed. After harvest with the
lifter-shaker charcoal is better mixed in the soil. Each bed received about 30 gallons of charcoal. Fertilizer and Composti were applied at rates normal for our farming practices.

We planted the plots in mid May and by late June they looked like this and this and this .

By the end of August the Swiss
Chard had matured
and we had our first harvest. Yields were impressive but no trends specific to treatments were noticed.

Here you can see our plot method for measuring yields of swiss chard and also how the separate treatments, Lonicera, Aster and swiss chard have grown together making assessment of total production rather difficult.
In late October I conducted a survey of the Lonicera component of the research plots. It was the end of the growing season but before the frost defoliated the plants.

Here is how the plots looked. My first look at the data that showed a subtle but encouraging trend of improvement from the use of charcoal 1.

In this set of images notice that the treatments with compost when combined with charcoal tended to be larger.
The same trend is also noticed in the compost/fertilizer/charcoal combinations. By mid November we were ready
to lift all the plant material from the plots, examine the roots and fall replant with a single species crop for next year. Here we have our lifter shaker harvesting the plants, Lonicera with charcoal staining roots and Rena picking up the plants. Later we replanted with our 4
row seeder
and reseeding with another native shrub species, Oemleria cerasiformis, chosen because it too is an agressive nitrogen consumer.

Finally the posters I have prepared to compare top growth and root growth in each of the treatment sets. I have organized the images according to groups of treatments as follows: The links are to the larger size images for better viewing. Edit note root images were created 11/15 not 10/25

First Groups 1 and 2 the control sets that received no treatment or had charcoal only
Roots
Field View

Next Groups 3 and 4 fertilizer sets Edit Roots is labeled as Groups 1 and 2
Roots
Field
View

Next Group 5 South end plots compost set
Roots
Field
View

Next Group 6 North end plots compost set
Roots
Field
View

I think these findings will be encouraging information for John Flotvik and many thanks for his donation of charcoal from his pyrolyser and thanks again to Larry Williams , his thoughtful work and helping when it is most needed.

I am looking forward to another season of data from this set of test plots. Comments, ideas, criticism, discussion whatever are appreciated as I am now preparing my season end report.

Richard Haard, Fourth Corner Nurseries, Bellingham,Washington.

Copyright January 3, 2008
Permission for distribution of these materials and images is granted for entire text and images only so long as the author and initial place of publication;"http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/" is
cited. Individual images may be used by permission only from author.

Syndicate content